Question 1: In cases where there is a disagreement over the wording of legal documentation, what is the mediator's best course of action?
Which action should you take?
Question 2: When is it appropriate for a mediator to introduce objective standards or criteria in negotiations?
Which action should you take?
Question 3: How does a mediator use legal research to support a fair and balanced mediation process when one party seems to have an advantage?
Which action should you take?
Question 4: How should a mediator manage a negotiation when one party repeatedly rejects all proposed solutions?
Which action should you take?
Question 5: In what situations is it appropriate for a mediator to offer suggestions during the mediation process?
Which action should you take?
Question 6: How does a mediator assess the relative power of each party in a negotiation?
Which action should you take?